ISO2859-1 for AQL Inspection? What are the major differences?ĪSME, ANSI, ASTM and similar specifications and their requirements for document control.ĭatabase that lists labs accredited to ASTM / ANSI standardsĪNSI/AAMI versions of 6 and related testing requirements Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries Understanding True position - Drawing Feature Control Frames - ANSI Y14.5ĪNSI Y14.5M Absolute Limits and Measurement questionĪNSI/ASQC Z1.9 VS MIL-STD-1916 for Continuous Sampling GD&T (ANSI Y14.5) Perpendicularity Callouts Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related RequirementsįAI and ANSI Y14.5 Trailing Zeros and Print Tolerances ASME-Y14.5M - Does an ANSI-Y14.5M-1994 document actually exist?
My question am I not utilizing some additional tolerance that I could possibly be allowed? Or is my manager taking liberties he does not have? Or are we both misinterpreting things here?ĪNSI-Y14.5M vs. Secondly this callout is clearly RFS only, no where does it allow any bonus tolerance. 4.5.4 “Specifying Datum Features at MMC”. I disagree for several reasons, firstly that this paragraph is being taken out of context and only has acceptability in reference to para.
4.5.4.2 “Size of a Secondary or Tertiary Datum Feature” (pg 58) that gives him this liberty.
This print invoked ANSI Y14.5-1994 and he is citing para. Datum C has a position callout of He argues that he is allowed additional tolerance for the 3 features located based on utilizing the allowable tolerance from the position of datum C. The datum’s are A=plane, B=circle and C=circle. We have a print with a callout of 3 places. I am hoping someone will be able to help settle a debate between my manager and I in regards to the acceptability of addition “bonus” or datum shift allowance.
0 kommentar(er)
